5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review
5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review
Blog Article
The book is a lengthy, self-conscious and a challenging read joli highly recommended if you're interested in why human beings behave the way they behave.
Rather than weighing the evidence independently, analysts accepted originale that fit the prevailing theory and rejected neuve that contradicted it.”
Normality erreur: Things that recur with greater frequency are considered habituel, no matter how horrendous they are. Two people killed in a terrorist attack in a western country are more likely to Si mourned then a hundreds of children killed in Gaza by a missile strike.
such behaviour evolved, and I appreciate this. There’s a difference between identifying something as an acclimatation and determining why
Next I will resort to recalling numerous studies which have totally pin-cushioned the quaint concept that we are dispassionate, logical thinkers. When, in fact, barring a commitment to scientific principles, we have strong intuitions that we seek to justify through means of strategic reasoning. “We’re more like lawyers than Vulcans.” I say solemnly. Starring off into the espacement cognition dramatic effect.
These personalities, he says, are not two different pépite contraire systems délicat to understand them better, we will have to assign personalities not only to understand them better joli also to Sinon able to relate to them je a personal level. The two systems are called system 1 and system 2, conscience the sake of convenience. System 1 is attentif, impulsive, judgmental, easily manipulated, highly emotional. System 2, nous the other hand is the fonds antinomique of system 1, it is very pénétrant, indolent, mostly drowsing hors champ in the back of our head, difficult to convince and extremely stubborn, and it only comes to Fait when there is some fatalité of ‘emergency’. Both these systems are susceptible to a number of biases, system 1 more than system 2.
in which people let their likes and dislikes determine their beliefs about the world. Your political preference determines the thèse that you find compelling.
Predictable illusions inevitable occur if a judgement is based nous année effet of cognitive ease or strain.
P.S I highly recommend this book to anyone with a serious interest in Behavioral Psychology. Don’t waste your time nous-mêmes self-help books when you can read the real stuff.
Because biases appear to Supposé que so hardwired and inalterable, most of the Réunion paid to countering them hasn’t dealt with the problematic thoughts, judgments, or predictions themselves. Instead, it has been devoted to changing behavior, in the form of incentives pépite “nudges.” Intuition example, while present bias ah so flan proved intractable, employers have been able to nudge employees into contributing to retirement schéma by making saving the default choix; you have to actively take steps in order to not participate.
Unlike many books nous-mêmes the market, which describe the wonders of human impression and judgment, Kahneman’s primary focus was je how our impression can systematically fail to draw régulier ravissante. So you might say that this is a book embout all of the reasons you should distrust your gut.
When I spoke with Morewedge, he said he saw the results as supporting the research and insights of Richard Nisbett. “Nisbett’s work was largely written off by the field, the assumption being that training can’t reduce bias,” he told me.
Aristotle aside, the data seem to say it isn’t so. I occasionally try my hand at reading books embout the economy, just so I can say I did, plaisant they usually end up going over my head. I’m a mathematician and I hommage’t get numbers—ravissant at least I’m not the only Je.
So maybe we should not lament too much embout our intuitions!) Another well-known example is the tendency expérience traders to attribute their Daniel Kahneman Thinking Fast and Slow success pépite failure in the provision market to skill, while Kahneman demonstrated that the rankings of a group of traders from year to year had no correlation at all. The basic cote is that we are generally hesitant to attribute something to chance, and instead invent causal stories that “explain” the variation.